The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte JENNIFER L. HILLMAN and SURYA K. GOLI __________ Appeal 2006-3288 Application 10/316,761 Technology Center 1600 __________ DECIDED: May 16, 2007 __________ Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and LORA M. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims to antibodies specific for a human pancreatitis-associated (PAP) protein, termed PAP-2. The Examiner has rejected the claims as anticipated and obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We affirm. BACKGROUND “The reg/PSP multigene family comprises genes encoding secretory proteins which are expressed in the pancreas” (Specification 2: 9-10), and “include[s] genes encoding pancreatitis-associated proteins (PAPs), whichPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013