Ex Parte Kane - Page 19



            Appeal 2006-3331                                                                               
            Application 10/829,797                                                                         
            providers to verify check information for processing.  In particular, Abecassis                
            discloses a deposit protection center 40 that processes inputs provided from                   
            communications equipment 100, verifies credit-related information on that                      
            equipment, and then processes and sends payment once the transaction has been                  
            successfully completed (Finding of Fact 12).  In one embodiment, the purchaser                 
            uses a check to pay for the transaction (Finding of Fact 13).  Communications                  
            equipment 100 includes a personal computer/modem 102 and/or a touch tone                       
            phone 103, where these devices are used to provide input and receive information               
            from the deposit protection center 40, such as information about the check                     
            presented by the purchaser (Finding of Fact 14).  Abecassis teaches that the deposit           
            protection center is under the control of an independent third party, i.e., unrelated          
            to either party to the transaction (Finding of Fact 15).                                       
                  As such, we conclude that one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the           
            invention was made would have been led from the teaching of Abecassis of using                 
            an independent third party service provider for check verification to modify the               
            system of McNeal to transmit checking account information and personal                         
            identification access information over an electronic network to an independent                 
            third party service provider for verification.  See KSR, 127 S.Ct. at 1740, 82                 
            USPQ2d at 1396 (the improvement is nothing more than the predictable use of                    
            prior art elements according to their established functions).  Further, it is common           
            sense that since a retailer’s customers do not all bank with the same financial                
            institution, there would be a market need for a data aggregator, i.e., an entity who           
            would maintain a universal database of checking account information and personal               

                                                    19                                                     



Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013