Ex Parte Hirzel - Page 10

                   Appeal 2006-3366                                                                                                 
                   Application 10/864,041                                                                                           
                   and not the specific ratios of 0.25-1.0 and 0.50 in dependent claims 12 and                                      
                   13 (Br. 21 and Reply Br. 14).2                                                                                   
                           Appellant argues that  the teachings of Hendershot teach theoretically                                   
                   possible machine configurations that encompass a spectrum of values of                                           
                   SPP, but that the disclosure falls short of any enabling disclosure (Br. 22).                                    
                   Additionally, Appellant contends that the tables of Hendershot were                                              
                   generated by a computer and that many of the configurations have never                                           
                   been made (Br. 23).  While these facts are true, we do not find that this                                        
                   would have been a “teaching away” or a persuasive teaching to follow a                                           
                   different path than Appellant’s contend the present invention goes.                                              
                   Therefore, Appellants' argument is not persuasive.  Obviousness does not                                         
                   require absolute predictability, only a reasonable expectation of success, i.e.,                                 
                   a reasonable expectation of obtaining similar properties. See, e.g., In re                                       
                   O'Farrell, 853 F.2d 894, 903, 7 USPQ2d 1673, 1681 (Fed. Cir. 1988).                                              
                           Here, we find that Appellant has speculated throughout the Brief and                                     
                   Reply Brief as to why it would not have been obvious to one skilled in the                                       
                   art at the time of the invention and that those skilled in the art would not                                     
                   have been motivated to make the big motors that the present invention works                                      
                   well with, such as with the larger number of poles (argument from the                                            
                   hearing).  However, arguments of counsel cannot take the place of factually                                      
                   supported objective evidence.  See, e.g., In re Huang, 100 F.3d 135, 139-40,                                     
                   40 USPQ2d 1685, 1689 (Fed. Cir. 1996); In re De Blauwe, 736 F.2d 699,                                            
                                                                                                                                    
                   2   We note that Appellant has not set forth the arguments to dependent                                          
                   claims 12 and 13 with a separate heading as required by 37 C.F.R. § 41.37,                                       
                   but we will address Appellant’s arguments thereto.  We note that Appellant                                       
                   has included dependent claims 12 and 13 as grouped with dependent claim                                          
                   4, 8, 9, 12-14 and 17 at page 37 of the Brief and page 21 of the Reply Brief.                                    

                                                                10                                                                  

Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013