Appeal 2006-3369 Application 10/224,309 FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of Fact concerning Group 1: Claims 1, 2, 6 – 17, 21 – 32, 36 – 45 including independent claims 1 (method of operation), 16 (apparatus), and 31 (article of manufacture): 1. The arguments of Appellant and Examiner on these claims center exclusively around the fourth limitation of Claim 1, namely “automatically providing by the computing environment, to the person, one or more policy materials for compliance certification, based at least in part on relevant parts of said updated employee information, …”. Examiner contends that the Gullotta reference teaches this limitation; Appellant contends that Gullotta does not disclose it. (Br. 8). 2. The interpretation of “policy materials for compliance certification” becomes a key finding for the consideration of whether these claims are anticipated by Gullotta. The “ordinary meaning” of the phrase would refer to documents containing policy statements, training materials, forms, and other managerial papers that are used in conjunction with a person’s role in the organization to assist 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013