Appeal 2006-3369 Application 10/224,309 5. We find the documents described in Gullotta as “soft resources” to be of much the same nature as the “policy materials” in the claims and disclosed in the specification of the instant application. Considering the breadth of the informational documents that are taught by Gullotta as being supplied to the user based upon his role in the organization, we find that that “policy materials for compliance certification” read on the documents supplied the user in Gullotta. Findings of Fact concerning Group 2: Claims 3-5, 18-20, and 33 to 35, which are respectively dependent from independent claims 1 (method of operation), 16 (apparatus), and 31 (article of manufacture): 1. Appellant argues that the Examiner erred in asserting that the limitations in claim 3 (and parallel limitations in the other claims of this Group) were anticipated by Gullotta. He asserts that the following limitation is not found in Gullotta: “determining by the computing environment, if the person has fully certified compliance with the provided one or more policies [actually ‘policy materials’ are the words in the claim], scheduling by the computing environment, one or more reminders for the person to 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013