Ex Parte Auweter et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-3377                                                                               
                Application 09/929,075                                                                         


                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                   
                      The field of the invention is “solid preparations . . . suitable for the                 
                food sector and animal feed sector or for pharmaceutical and cosmetic                          
                applications.”  (Specification (hereafter “Spec.”) 1, ll. 4-6.)  The claimed                   
                subject matter is reflected in claim 1, reproduced below:2                                     
                      1.  A solid preparation of at least two active compounds                                 
                      suitable for the food sector and animal feed sector or for                               
                      pharmaceutical and cosmetic applications in the form of a                                
                      multicore structure in which at least two cores of a multicore                           
                      structure have a different chemical composition.                                         
                      According to the specification, the claimed preparations “firstly                        
                prevent or decrease unwanted interactions between the active compounds                         
                within the multicore structure by encapsulation of the individual active                       
                compounds, and secondly they permit more flexible organization of the                          
                production of user-friendly formulations of active-compound-containing                         
                mixtures.”  (Spec. at 3.)                                                                      
                      The Examiner relied on the following prior art:                                          
                      Horn    US 4,522,743  Jun.11, 1985                                                       
                      Khachik  US 5,382,714  Jan.17, 1995                                                      
                      Ausich   US 5,648,564  Jul. 15, 1997                                                     
                      Akamatsu   US 5,780,056  Jul. 14, 1998                                                   





                                                                                                              
                2 Appellants do not separately argue the claims.  Thus we consider the                         
                contentions of the Examiner and Appellants with respect to representative                      
                claim 1.                                                                                       
                                                      2                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013