The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES V. STOUT
____________
Appeal 2006-3386
Application 10/448,569
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: March 12, 2007
____________
Before STUART S. LEVY, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and LINDA E. HORNER,
Administrative Patent Judges.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
James V. Stout (“Appellant”) seeks our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the
Examiner’s final rejection of claims 3 and 4, the only claims pending in the
application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013