Ex Parte Stout - Page 3



             Appeal 2006-3386                                                                                  
             Application 10/448,569                                                                            
                          4.    A method for killing rodents, comprising the steps                             
                          of                                                                                   
                                (a) placing a delivery orifice into an underground                             
                          tunnel used by the rodents;                                                          
                                (b) delivering a first substantially odorless gaseous                          
                          mixture to and through the delivery orifice for a first                              
                          period of time, the first mixture specifically chosen to                             
                          render the gophers2 unconscious, preventing the gophers                              
                          in the tunnel from blocking the tunnel against further                               
                          application of gaseous mixture; and                                                  
                                (c) delivering a second gaseous mixture to and                                 
                          through the delivery orifice for a second period of time                             
                          after the first gaseous mixture is delivered, the second                             
                          gaseous mixture specifically chosen to kill the gophers                              
                          rendered unconscious by the first gaseous mixture.                                   

                                             THE REJECTIONS                                                    
                   The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability:                      
                    McQueen                   US 4,594,807               Jun. 17, 1986                         
                    Chu                       US 5,349,778               Sep. 27, 1994                         
                   The following rejections are before us for review.                                          
                1. Claims 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by                    
                   Chu.                                                                                        
                2. Claims 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious in view                   
                   of McQueen.                                                                                 

                                                                                                              
             2 We note that the reference to “the gophers” throughout the remainder of this                    
             claim lacks proper antecedent basis.                                                              
                                                      3                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013