Ex Parte Honma et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                   
                            publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               


                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                                ____________                                                     
                     Ex parte KAZUNARI HONMA and SHIGEHARU MATSUSHITA                                            
                                                ____________                                                     
                                            Appeal No. 2006-3405                                                 
                                         Application No. 10/631,858                                              
                                                ____________                                                     
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                ____________                                                     
             Before BLANKENSHIP, MACDONALD, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent                                    
             Judges.                                                                                             
             BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           




                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                   This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner=s                        
             final rejection of claims 1 and 4-10.                                                               
                   We reverse.                                                                                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013