Ex Parte Hollingsworth - Page 22



                Appeal 2007-0040                                                                             
                Application 10/170,069                                                                       
                Patent 6,073,699                                                                             

                                                     (6)                                                     
                                    What subject matter is surrendered?                                      
                      In a case involving Substep (3)(a) of Step 3 of Clement, what is the                   
                subject matter surrendered?                                                                  
                      Is it                                                                                  
                            (1) the subject matter of an application claim which was                         
                                   amended or canceled or                                                    
                            (2) the subject matter of an application claim which was                         
                                   amended or canceled and, on a limitation-by-limitation                    
                                   basis, the territory falling between the scope of                         
                                   (a) the application claim which was canceled or                           
                                         amended and                                                         
                                   (b) the patent claim which was ultimately issued?                         
                We believe North American Container stands for the proposition that it is                    
                (2) and not (1).  Accordingly, we hold that it is (2).                                       

                                                     (7)                                                     
                                   Clement principles are not per se rules                                   
                      Our reading of our appellate reviewing court’s recapture opinions, as                  
                a whole, suggests that the Clement steps should not be viewed as per se                      
                rules.  For example, we note the following in Clement, 131 F.3d at 1469, 45                  
                USPQ2d at 1164:                                                                              
                      Although the recapture rule does not apply in the absence of                           
                      evidence that the Appellant’s amendment was “an admission                              

                                                   - 22 -                                                    

Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013