Ex Parte Morton et al - Page 5

                Appeal 2007-0121                                                                                 
                Application 10/324,594                                                                           
                solids separation and crushing means are conventional well known prior art                       
                devices and unit operations which are available to one of ordinary skill in the                  
                art.2                                                                                            
                       Turning to the applied Nelson patent, the Examiner has correctly                          
                determined that Nelson discloses coating (combining) metal oxides, such as                       
                magnesium oxide, calcium oxide, zinc oxide, and copper oxide, onto                               
                expanded perlite particles to form a sulfur acceptor material (sorbent).  See                    
                the Answer (p. 3) and the sections of Nelson cited therein.  Appellants do                       
                not contest the Examiner’s determination that Nelson’s step of coating the                       
                particles of expanded perlite with metal oxides substantially corresponds to                     
                step (c) of representative claim 1 but for the arguments pertaining to the                       
                requirement of starting with selectively crushed perlite particles.  In other                    
                words, Appellants’ arguments for patentability of the claimed process center                     
                on step (a) and step (b).3  See the Briefs in their entirety.                                    
                       Nelson teaches that the expanded perlite particles should be sized                        
                similarly to an exfoliated vermiculate particle option, with the particles                       
                being no larger than approximately 0.1-0.25 inches in their largest                              
                dimension for exemplified fixed bed tests of the sorbent (col. 5, l. 63 – col.                   
                6, l. 25).  In addition to such a static or fixed bed, Nelson further discloses                  
                that the acceptors (sorbent) can be made for use in a bubbling or fluid                          
                                                                                                                
                2 It is axiomatic that admitted prior art, including prior art found in an                       
                Applicants' Specification, may be used in determining the patentability of a                     
                claimed invention and that consideration of the prior art cited by the                           
                Examiner may include consideration of the admitted prior art found in the                        
                Specification.  In re Nomiya, 509 F.2d 566, 570-571, 184 USPQ 607, 611-                          
                612 (CCPA 1975); In re Davis, 305 F.2d 501, 503, 134 USPQ 256, 258                               
                (CCPA 1962).                                                                                     
                3 Arguments not made in the Briefs are waived.  See 37 C.F.R.                                    
                § 41.37(c)(vii) (2006).                                                                          
                                                       5                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013