Ex Parte RE37,127 et al - Page 3

                Appeal 2007-0136                                                                              
                Application 90/006,222                                                                        
                      and vanadium carbides and alloys and mixtures thereof, the                              
                      sintered carbide pellets and the cast carbide pellets being                             
                      generally spherical; and                                                                
                             the balance of the hardfacing composition being matrix                           
                      metal, a portion of the matrix metal being in the form of a tube                        
                      filled with the sintered and cast carbide pellets.                                      
                      The principal differences between the two claims is that claim 1                        
                requires a specific weight-percentage for the carbide-pellet moiety, while                    
                claim 19 requires that a portion of the matrix-metal moiety be in the form of                 
                a tube filled with the carbide pellets.                                                       
                      An ambiguity exists between the preamble, which uses an open                            
                formulation ("composition comprising"), and the last limitation, which                        
                requires "the balance of the hardfacing composition [to be] matrix metal".                    
                While claims are before the agency, they are given their broadest reasonable                  
                construction.7  When there is a tension between an open and closed                            
                construction, we must give the claim the broader construction absent some                     
                clear indication to the contrary.8  Consequently, despite the "balance"                       
                limitation, we understand the claimed compositions to be open to the                          
                inclusion of other ingredients consistent with the purpose of the                             
                composition.                                                                                  
                      The "granules" limitation (only in claim 1) is also open-ended.  The                    
                limitation begins "at least 60% by weight of the composition being granules                   
                                                                                                             
                7 In re Bigio, 381 F.3d 1320, 1324, 72 USPQ2d 1209, 1210-11 (Fed. Cir.                        
                2004) (generally); In re Yamamoto, 740 F.2d 1569, 1571, 222 USPQ 934,                         
                936 (Fed. Cir. 1984) (reexamination); accord In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048,                     
                1057, 44 USPQ2d 1023, 1030 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (burden of precise claim                          
                drafting lies with applicant); see also Amgen Inc. v. Chugai Pharm. Co. Ltd.,                 
                927 F.2d 1200, 1218, 18 USPQ2d 1016, 1031 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (noting that                       
                the closer the prior art is, the greater the need for precision).                             
                8 In re Crish, 393 F.3d 1253, 1257, 73 USPQ2d 1364, 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2004).                    

                                                      3                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013