Appeal 2007-0136 Application 90/006,222 "particle". Newman uses "spherical" in its discussion of "[c]ast tungsten carbide particles".32 Level of skill We look to the evidence of record—the applicant's disclosure, the cited references, and any declaration testimony—in resolving the ordinary level of skill in the art.33 In this appeal no testimony is cited. We focus on what a person having ordinary skill in the art would know and be able to do. According to BHI, the hardfacing is a "long-standing practice in the design and manufacture" of surfaces subjected to abrasive wear.34 Thus, those of skill in the art had long-standing interest in, and experience with, the problems associated with hardfacing. Cast carbide particles were conventional, but sintered carbide particle had been taught to provide greater fracture toughness.35 The art also understood that mixed sintered and macrocrystalline carbides provided advantages over sintered carbides alone (hardness) and cast carbides alone (less brittleness).36 Newman provides embodiments for macrocrystalline, mixed macrocrystalline and sintered, and cast carbide particles without any discussion of there relative advantages, which suggests a confidence that those in the art would know how to choose the form of carbide or carbide mixtures best suited to their needs. 32 Newman 6:32-39. 33 Ex parte Jud, 2006 WL 4080053 at *2 (BPAI) (rehearing with expanded panel). 34 Spec. 1:13-16. 35 Spec. 1:45-56. 36 Spec. 1:56-67. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013