Appeal No. 2007-0161
Application No. 09/797,287
nondetectable levels, as taught by O'Brien. Answer, page 6.
Appellant does not specifically respond to this rejection but relies on their indicated
failings of Rentschler to overcome this rejection. Brief, page 12. In view of our findings
regarding the disclosure of Rentschler, herein, this rejection is affirmed.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1, 3, 6-8, 18, 19, 22, 30-33, and 35 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
over Rentschler is affirmed.
The rejection of claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over Rentschler is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 5, 12, 13, 34, 36, and 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Rentschler in view of Applicant’s admitted prior art is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 5, 12, 13, 34, 36, and 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Rentschler in view of O'Brien is affirmed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013