Ex Parte Wilhelm et al - Page 1


                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written         
                               for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                __________                                                  
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                __________                                                  
                           Ex parte HOA LA WILHELM, DAVE ALLEN SOERENS,                                     
                          LEE DELSON WILHELM, and JAMES HONGXUE WANG                                        
                                                __________                                                  
                                           Appeal No.  2007-0188                                            
                                        Application No.  10/683,789                                         
                                                __________                                                  
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                __________                                                  
               Before ADAMS, MILLS and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
               ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                      This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                       
               Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3-26 and 28, which are all the claims                
               pending in the application.                                                                  
                      Claim 10 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced            
               below:                                                                                       
                      10. A wearable article equipped with a multi-level alert system for                   
                          detecting two or more levels of a mammalian substance in a                        
                          mammalian extract, the wearable article comprising:                               
                            a substrate;                                                                    
                            a target area on the substrate including first and second sub-areas             
                          for receiving the mammalian extract; and                                          
                            a chemical detection system on the target area which initiates a first          
                          signal in response to a first level of the mammalian substance in the             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013