The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
___________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte ANTHONY T. VU
___________
Appeal 2007-0204
Application 10/938,966
Technology Center 3700
___________
Decided: 31 October 2007
___________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON REHEARING
Appellant requests rehearing of that portion of our decision entered
January 31, 2007,1 wherein we affirmed a rejection of claims 51-54 for lack
of written description under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. Appellant does
not request rehearing of that portion of our decision in which we affirmed a
rejection of claim 45 as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph.
The request for rehearing is granted-in-part.
1 The date stamp on the opinion erroneously reads "January 31, 2006."
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013