Ex Parte Vu - Page 7



             Appeal No. 2007-0204                                                                  
             Application 10/938,966                                                                
                                                3.                                                 
                   Appellant argues that the Specification does support "reduced" slice            
             gradients (Req. Reh'g 4-5):                                                           
                         In imaging sequences such as represented in Fig. 2, a thick slice         
                   or slab of the scan subject is defined by the S1 gradient.  See                 
                   Specification, pg. 8 (stating that thick slice or slab thickness is varied      
                   by varying S1).  For 3D imaging, data from a number of thin slices or           
                   steps within the slab is acquired and combined in image reconstruction          
                   to form an image with improved resolution along the third or                    
                   "thickness" dimension of the slab.  See Specification, pg. 1.  It is the        
                   slice encoding and rewinder gradients S3 and S4 which determine the             
                   slice or step within the slab that is being imaged by each FID signal.          
                   See Specification, pg 8; Fig. 2.  One skilled in the art will appreciate        
                   that the strength of the slice encoding and rewinder gradients S3 and S4        
                   relates to the number of slices or steps imageable within the slab, and         
                   thus relates to the 3D resolution.  See Specification, pgs. 1, 8.  In           
                   reference to the embodiment shown in Fig. 3, the Specification states           
                   that "since the slice encoding gradient is disabled completely in the 2D        
                   mode, the acquisition is a true 2D acquisition and not a low-resolution         
                   3D acquisition."  Specification, pg. 8 (emphasis added).  A true 2D             
                   acquisition is one in which the slab is not sub-divided into slices or          
                   steps -- thus "a 'single slice' 3D acquisition" is essentially a form of 2D     
                   acquisition.  Id.  In other words, when slice encoding and rewinder             
                   gradients are not disabled completely, but are merely disabled, they are        
                   reduced, and a low-resolution 3D acquisition results.  Id.  Applicant           
                   disclosed both.                                                                 
                         Accordingly, though the embodiment shown and described with               
                   respect to Fig. 3 depicts two slice encoding and rewinder gradients             
                   being turned off completely, the Specification does show that the               
                   inventor had full possession of the invention and appreciated that the          
                   gradients could simply be diminished through disabling, while not               
                   being disabled completely.  While that may not always be the preferred          
                                               - 7 -                                               



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013