Appeal 2007-0264
Application 09/986,248
individually. Thus, the packed message approach, as taught by Halpern,
would allow selected software components at the client to all be received at
the server at the same time, and without delay.
Further, the Examiner properly found that the combination of Halpern
and Feinman would lead one of ordinary skill in the art to output or display
the unpacked objects in a specified order. The ordinarily skilled artisan
would have readily recognized, as taught by Feinman, as objects in a
received message are sequentially being unpacked and decompressed, the
client would save time by immediately processing and displaying them in
the order that they appear in the message.
After considering the entire record before us, we find that the
Examiner did not err in rejecting claims 4 through 10, 16 through 23, 27
through 29, 31 and 32 over the combination of Halpern taken alone or in
combination with Feinman.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
On the record before us, Halpern’s disclosure anticipates the claimed
invention under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (e) when Halpern teaches that the client
processes in batch mode a self-extracting executable file received from the
server in response to a request. Further, one of ordinary skill in the art at the
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013