Appeal 2007-0264
Application 09/986,248
time of the present invention, have found Halpern, alone or in combination
with Feinman, renders the claimed invention unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) when Halpern teaches a packetization transport protocol and
Feinman teaches transferring a sequential file containing a plurality of
objects.
DECISION
We affirm the Examiner’s decision to reject claims 1 through 3, 13
through 15, 25 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by
Halpern. We also affirm the Examiner’s decision to reject claims 4, 5, 16
and 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Halpern.
Additionally, we affirm the Examiner’s decision to reject claims 6 through
10, 18 through 23, 27 through 29, 31 and 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over the combination of Halpern and Feinman.
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013