Appeal 2007-0278
Application 10/042,047
713, which would be used to decrypt the following packets, and
so on. Rule 710 could additionally release Cryptographic Key
716, corresponding to Organization Stream 52, which
corresponds to video without advertisements.
(Shamoon, ¶ 0102).
Therefore, we find that the language of the claim (i.e., wherein
multiple offers are defined by a non-URL descriptive portion of a script
header to the web page content) broadly but reasonably reads on Shamoon’s
Rule 710 in the manner argued by the Examiner, i.e., where Rule 710
corresponds to “a non-URL descriptive portion of a script header” and
“Controlled Streams 49-53” correspond to “the web page content” (see
Shamoon Fig. 7, see also instant claim 22). Accordingly, we will sustain the
Examiner’s rejection of dependent claim 22 as being anticipated by
Shamoon.
Claims 30, 38, 41, and 42
We consider next the Examiner’s rejection of dependent claims 30,
38, 41, and 42 as being anticipated by Shamoon.
Appellants argue that claims 30, 38, 41, and 42 should be allowed for
the same reasons previously argued for independent claims 27 and 35, from
which these claims depend (Br. 11).
We note that Appellants have not presented any substantive
arguments directed separately to the patentability of dependent claims 30,
38, 41, and 42 . In the absence of a separate argument with respect to the
dependent claims, those claims stand or fall with the representative
independent claim. See In re Young, 927 F.2d 588, 590, 18 USPQ2d 1089,
1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991). See also 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii)(2004).
14
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013