Appeal 2007-0278 Application 10/042,047 patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 9, 15, 21, 29, and 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shamoon (US 2004/0107356 A1) in view of Dalzell et al. (US 2003/0204447 that is a non-provisional of provisional application 60/336409, filed October 31, 2001). Claims 3, 9, 15, 21, 29, and 37 Shamoon discloses the invention substantially as claimed (see the Examiner’s rejections of corresponding independent claims 1, 7, 13, 19, 27, and 35, respectively, as set forth in the Answer (pp. 4-5), and incorporated herein by reference. However, Shamoon does not explicitly teach: “wherein the prices of the options are based on an age of the at least a portion of the single web page content,” as claimed (claims 3, 9, 15, 21, 29, and 37). Dalzell teaches and/or suggests the prices of the options are based on an age of the at least a portion of the single web page content: See e.g., paragraph 0071: [0071] In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the online marketplace system may provide a service for suggesting a suitable selling or asking price to the creator of a marketplace or preorder listing, respectively. For example, the system may use one or more of the following criteria to suggest a selling price to a user who is creating a marketplace listing: the current retail price for the product, the manufacture's suggested retail price, the condition and/or age of the product (as specified by the user, or predicted from the user's purchase history in the 18Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013