Appeal 2007-0325
Application 09/780,248
1 “allowing” to positively recite the object of allowing as claimed subject
2 matter is not sustained.
3 • The rejection of claims 15, 16, and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as
4 anticipated by Barzilai is sustained.
5 • The rejection of claim 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Holden
6 is not sustained.
7 • The rejection of claims 5-7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over
8 Shoham and eBay Help is sustained.
9 • The rejection of claims 9-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over
10 Shoham and Harrington is sustained.
11 • The rejection of claims 23, 24, and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
12 over Barzilai and Auction This! is sustained.
13 • The rejection of claims 25 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over
14 Barzilai, Auction This!, and Dinwoodie is sustained.
15 • The rejection of claim 17 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Barzilai
16 and Ladner is sustained.
17 • The rejection of claim 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Barzilai
18 and Scaer is sustained.
19 • The rejection of claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Shoham
20 and Scaer is sustained.
21 • The rejection of claims 21 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over
22 Shoham, Barzilai, and Scaer is sustained.
24
Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013