Appeal 2007-0357
Application 10/180,862
signals are to be prevented in dependent claim 4 and from what their
prevented “from reaching” means. The “to be prior” features of dependent
claims 14 and 15 relate to future acts that may never occur and do not recite
what “to be prior” is to be considered to be prior with respect to.
In view of the foregoing, we have sustained the Examiner’s rejections
of various claims under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103. Accordingly, the
decision of the Examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §1.136(a). See 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
PGC
Lenovo (US) IP Law
Mail Stop ZHHA/B675/PO Box 12195
3039 Cornwallis Road
RTP NC 27709-2195
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013