The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RICKY S. AMOS, ARNE W. BALLANTINE, GREGORY BAZAN, BOMY A. CHEN, DOUGLAS D. COOLBAUGH, HEIDI L. GREER, HERBERT L. HO, JOSEPH F. KUDLACIK, BERNARD P. LEROY, PAUL C. PARRIES, and GARY L. PATTON ____________ Appeal No. 2007-0377 Application No. 10/151,897 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: March 19, 2007 ____________ Before KENNETH W.HAIRSTON, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 60-82, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We affirm.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013