Ex Parte Amos et al - Page 1

                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                              
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                             Ex parte RICKY S. AMOS, ARNE W. BALLANTINE,                                            
                    GREGORY BAZAN, BOMY A. CHEN, DOUGLAS D. COOLBAUGH,                                              
                        HEIDI L. GREER, HERBERT L. HO, JOSEPH F. KUDLACIK,                                          
                     BERNARD P. LEROY, PAUL C. PARRIES, and GARY L. PATTON                                          
                                               Appeal No. 2007-0377                                                 
                                            Application No. 10/151,897                                              
                                             Technology Center 2800                                                 
                                             Decided: March 19, 2007                                                
             Before KENNETH W.HAIRSTON, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and JEAN R.                                              
             HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                  
             SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   

                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                    This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the Examiner’s                       
             final rejection of claims 60-82, which are all of the claims pending in this                           
                    We affirm.                                                                                      

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013