Appeal 2007-0377
Application 10/151,897
With respect to the rejection of the remaining claims, we note that
Appellants merely rely on the same arguments addressed above and assert that the
additional references relied on for rejecting the claims fail to make up for the
identified deficiencies of Schrems ‘703 and Sze (Br. 16-19). Based on our findings
above and the weight of arguments presented by Appellants and the Examiner’s
response, we sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claim 65 over Schrems ‘703,
Sze and Saito, of claims 68, 74, and 75 over Schrems ‘703, Sze and Schrems ‘928,
of claims 76 and 77 over Schrems ‘703, Sze, and Nicollian and of claim 81 over
Hsue and Saito.
CONCLUSION
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 78-80
and 82 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and claims 60-77 and 81 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013