The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BEA CALO and WILLIAM JOHNSON
____________
Appeal 2007-0394
Application 09/769,036
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: July 20, 2007
____________
Before HUBERT C. LORIN, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,
Administrative Patent Judges.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 3, 4, 6-8, 11-13, 21, 22, 24-26, and 29-30. We have jurisdiction
under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013