The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
____________
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YANHUA SHIH,
MILENA D'ANGELO,
and MARIA CHEKHOVA
____________
Appeal 2007-0465
Application 10/146,8131
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: June 28, 2007
____________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and
JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the final
rejection of claims 1-7. Claims 8-17 have been canceled. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm-in-part.
1 Application for patent filed May 17, 2002, entitled "Multi-Photon
Imaging and Quantum Lithography," which claims the priority benefit U.S.
Provisional Application 60/292,265, filed May 18, 2001.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013