The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TINGHAO F. WANG ____________ Appeal 2007-0488 Application 10/071,809 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: February 28, 2007 ____________ Before TERRY J. OWENS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL In a prior Decision dated Jan. 24, 2006, in an appeal in this application (Appeal No. 2006-0293), this merits panel reversed all grounds of rejection on appeal and remanded the application to the jurisdiction of the Examiner for consideration of a rejection based on 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for lack of enabling disclosure (see the Decision dated Jan. 24, 2006, pp. 6-7). Pursuant to this remand, the Examiner rejected claims 1, 3-12, 14, 15, 21-23,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013