Ex Parte Wang - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                           ____________                                             
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                       
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                           ____________                                             
                                   Ex parte TINGHAO F. WANG                                         
                                           ____________                                             
                                         Appeal 2007-0488                                           
                                       Application 10/071,809                                       
                                      Technology Center 1700                                        
                                           ____________                                             
                                     Decided: February 28, 2007                                     
                                           ____________                                             

              Before TERRY J. OWENS, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                           
              CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
              WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                   

                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                    In a prior Decision dated Jan. 24, 2006, in an appeal in this application       
              (Appeal No. 2006-0293), this merits panel reversed all grounds of rejection           
              on appeal and remanded the application to the jurisdiction of the Examiner            
              for consideration of a rejection based on 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for       
              lack of enabling disclosure (see the Decision dated Jan. 24, 2006, pp. 6-7).          
              Pursuant to this remand, the Examiner rejected claims 1, 3-12, 14, 15, 21-23,         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013