Appeal 2007-0488 Application 10/071,809 25, and 27, the only claims pending in this application, under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (Supplemental Examiner’s Answer dated May 24, 2006, p. 2). Appellant has submitted a Reply Brief dated July 24, 2006, in response to the Examiner’s rejection, requesting the “appeal be maintained” (Reply Br. cover letter). Accordingly, this is a decision on this appeal (Appeal No. 2007-0488). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a method of etching a metal silicide layer while fabricating an integrated circuit using a chlorine/oxygen gas environment at a pressure of about 2 to 40 mili-Torr and an oxygen concentration of greater than or equal to 25% by volume to selectively etch the metal silicide over polysilicon at a ratio of at least 30:1 (prior Decision, pp. 1-2; Reply Br. 1). Independent claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and is reproduced below: 1. A method comprising, etching a metal silicide layer during fabrication of an integrated circuit in a Cl2/O2 environment having an O2 concentration of greater than or equal to 25% by volume, wherein the Cl2/O2, environment is provided at a pressure of approximately 2-40 mili-Torr, and wherein the etching is a metal silicide etch that is selective to poly-silicon with a ratio of etch rates of at least 30. The Examiner has relied upon the following reference as evidence to support the rejection: Nojiri , “High rate and highly selective anisotropic etching for WSix/poly-Si using electron cyclotron resonance plasma,” 14 J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B, 1791-95 (May/June 1996). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013