1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
2 was not written for publication and
3 is not binding precedent of the Board.
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
8 _____________
9
10 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
11 AND INTERFERENCES
12 _____________
13
14 Ex parte ALAIN P. KING and MAHAN MOVASSAGHI
15 _____________
16
17 Appeal No. 2007-0490
18 Application No. 10/095,716
19 Technology Center 3600
20 ______________
21
22 Decided: March 21, 2007
23 _______________
24
25 Before JENNIFER D. BAHR, STUART S. LEVY, and ROBERT E. NAPPI,
25 Administrative Patent Judges.
26
27
28 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
29
30
31 DECISION ON APPEAL
32
33 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final
34 rejection of claims 1 through 16. For the reasons stated infra we affirm the
35 Examiner’s rejection of these claims.
36
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013