Ex Parte Yokoyama et al - Page 4

               Appeal No. 2007-0491                                                                                           
               Application No. 10/495,074                                                                                     

               2.  ANTICIPATION                                                                                               
                      Claims 17-25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated                                     
               by Satoshi.1  The Examiner argues that Satoshi “discloses a curable                                            
               composition comprising the first monomer (designated in the reference as C)                                    
               . . . and the second monomer (designated in the reference as A),” which “can                                   
               be formed in[to] optical components by curing the composition, expressly                                       
               listing optical lenses and disks as possible end products.  See [0040].”                                       
               (Answer 3.)                                                                                                    
                      The Examiner also argues that “the mercapto compounds disclosed in                                      
               [Satoshi] are not excluded from the claimed compositions by the transitional                                   
               phrase ‘consisting essentially.’”  (Id.)  In particular, the Examiner argues                                   
               that the above-quoted statement on page 2 of the specification regarding the                                   
               object of the invention “is a clear indication [of] what is considered to be the                               
               basic and novel characteristics” of the invention.  (Answer 5.)  The                                           
               Examiner argues that “[w]hile some of the characteristics of any                                               
               composition would be affected by the presence of ANY additional                                                
               component, addi[ng] mercapto compound clearly does not affect the                                              
               characteristics regarded by the applicants as basic and novel characteristics                                  
               of the claimed compositions as evident from the discussion in paragraph                                        
               [0026] of the supplied translation.”  (Answer 5-6.)                                                            
                      We conclude that the Examiner has set forth a prima facie case that                                     
               claim 17 is anticipated by Satoshi.  Satoshi describes a resin composition                                     
                                                                                                                             
               1 Satoshi et al., Japanese Patent Document No. JP 11-223703, published             Formatted: French (France)  
               August 17, 1999.  The record contains an English-language abstract, a                                          
               partial translation, and a full computer-generated translation of Satoshi.  We                                 
               cite to each of these documents at different points.                                                           
                                                     4                                                                        









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013