The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ROBERT H. WOLLENBERG
and THOMAS J. BALK
__________
Appeal No. 2007-0511
Application No. 10/699,5081
___________
Decided: 20 September 2007
___________
Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY,
Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 A. STATEMENT OF CASE
2 Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
3 claims 1-23. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
4 Appellants’ invention is directed to a high throughput screening
5 method and system for measuring the oxidation stability of lubricating oil
1 Application 10/699,508 was filed on October 31, 2003. The real party in
interest is Chevron Oronite Company LLC.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013