Appeal 2007-0511 Application 10/699,508 1 C. FINDINGS OF FACT 2 The following findings of fact are believed to be supported by a 3 preponderance of the evidence. Additional findings of fact as necessary 4 appear in the Analysis portion of the opinion. 5 1. Appellants’ Specification 6 The Appellants’ invention relates generally to methods for high 7 throughput screening of lubricating oil compositions. Specification, p. 1, ll. 8 6-7. 9 The Appellants define “high throughput” as meaning that a relatively 10 large number of different lubricating oil compositions are rapidly prepared 11 and analyzed. Specification, p. 5, ll. 7-10. 12 The lubricating oil compositions for use in the high throughput 13 screening method include a major amount of base oil of lubricating 14 viscosity. Specification, p. 6, ll. 1-5. 15 The base oil may be any natural or synthetic lubricating base oil. 16 Specification, p. 7, ll. 10-12. 17 The lubricating oil compositions also include at least one lubricating 18 oil additive that can be any presently known or later-discovered additive 19 used in formulating lubricating oil compositions. Specification, p. 11, ll. 17- 20 19. 21 Samples of the lubricating oil compositions can be analyzed for 22 oxidation stability measurements such as oxidation consumption data, 23 deposit data, viscosity data, etc. Specification, p. 23, ll. 5-7. 24 The invention includes a testing station 220 which includes means for 25 testing samples for oxidation stability, i.e., resistance to oxidation. 26 Specification, p. 24, ll. 7-8. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013