Ex Parte Shana et al - Page 1



                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                       is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                  __________                                                     
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                  __________                                                     
                            Ex parte MAY SHANA’A, MICHAEL C. CHENEY,                                             
                                   ROBERT AVENA, KEVIN KEATING,                                                  
                            CRAIG S. SLAVTCHEFF, BRIAN J. DOBKOWSKI,                                             
                               ROSA PAREDES, MARION L. MARGOSIAK,                                                
                             CHRISTY BRIDGES, and MARCINA SICILIANO                                              
                                                  __________                                                     
                                              Appeal 2007-0533                                                   
                                            Application 09/930,320                                               
                                           Technology Center 1600                                                
                                                  __________                                                     
                                         Decided: September 7, 2007                                              
                                                  __________                                                     
                Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES, and RICHARD M.                                              
                LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to a method                      
                of providing a customized personal care product, which the Examiner has                          
                rejected as obvious.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We                           
                affirm.                                                                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013