Appeal 2007-0533
Application 09/930,320
These arguments are unpersuasive. Custom formulation of personal
care products is taught by Rath, and the issue of motivation-to-combine is
addressed in our discussion of this rejection in the decision in Appeal 2005-
1428. The rejection of claim 24 is affirmed. Claim 23 falls with claim 24.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
lbg
UNILEVER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP
700 SYLVAN AVENUE,
BLDG C2 SOUTH
ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS NJ 07632-3100
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013