1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered
2 today is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte ROBERT J. CENCER and MICHAEL J. RENCH
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2007-0585
16 Application No. 10/338,813
17 Technology Center 3600
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: August 31, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before TERRY J. OWENS, HUBERT C. LORIN, and JOSEPH A. FISCHETTI,
23
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30 The Appellants appeal from a rejection of claims 1-11, which are all of the
31 pending claims.
32 THE INVENTION
33 The Appellants claim a tri-level railcar for carrying automotive vehicles.
34 Claim 1 is illustrative:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013