Ex Parte Cencer et al - Page 3

             Appeal 2007-0585                                                                                  
             Application 10/338,813                                                                            

        1    final assembly (col. 5, ll. 6-13).  The upper tier decks are supported on V-shaped                
        2    box beams that are welded to the container’s side and end walls and cooperate with                
        3    other components to satisfy the container’s strength requirements (Fylling, col. 1,               
        4    ll. 32-41).                                                                                       
        5          Lewin discloses “a railroad car with adjustable floor and roof sections that                
        6    allow a user to convert the car from a tri-level to a bi-level car or to a single level           
        7    car, and to reduce the overall height of the car, while lowering the car’s center of              
        8    gravity and alleviating the problem of route height restrictions” (Lewin, col. 1, ll.             
        9    42-47).  Lewin discloses (Lewin, col. 2, ll. 54-64):                                              
       10                 A typical loading procedure is accomplished by raising the entire                    
       11          second floor, or part of it, and loading the bottom level first.  Next, the                 
       12          second floor is lowered to the minimum clearance, locked in place and then                  
       13          loaded.  After this, the third level is lowered, locked in place and then                   
       14          loaded.  Finally, the roof is lowered, locked in place and the access doors                 
       15          closed.  To unload the vehicles, the loading steps are simply performed in                  
       16          reverse order.                                                                              
       17                 In another embodiment of the invention, the second and third floors                  
       18          may be hinged to allow the loading of smaller vehicles without the need to                  
       19          raise or lower the entire floor.                                                            
       20                                                                                                      
       21          The Appellants argue that Lewin’s disclosure that the described floor and                   
       22    roof assemblies are an integral part of the car structure (Lewin, col. 3, ll. 30-31)              
       23    limits the combination of Lewin with Fylling to a railcar having adjustable floors                
       24    (Br. 5).  The Appellants further argue that combining Lewin and Fylling requires                  
       25    adding a frame to Fylling that Fylling omits to reduce the container’s weight                     
       26    (Reply Br. 4).                                                                                    
       27          In the Background of the Invention section of the Appellants’ Specification,                
       28    the Appellants acknowledge that hinged end sections have been used in the art on                  
       29    the decks of the second level tiers of tri-level auto rack railcars to obtain increased           

                                                       3                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013