1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written 2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 8 ____________________ 9 10 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 11 AND INTERFERENCES 12 ____________________ 13 14 Ex parte THOMAS N. MILLIKAN and CHARLES E. McCALLUM 15 ____________________ 16 17 Appeal 2007-0588 18 Application 10/202,349 19 Technology Center 2100 20 ____________________ 21 22 Decided: May 22, 2007 23 ____________________ 24 25 26 27 Before: MAHSHID D. SAADAT, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and 28 JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges. 29 30 MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge. 31 32 33 34 DECISION ON APPEAL 35 STATEMENT OF CASE 36 Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a Final Rejection of 37 claims 1-6 and 19-21. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013