Ex Parte Holtz et al - Page 2

            Appeal 2007-0595                                                                                
            Application 09/822,855                                                                          

        1       The Appellants invented a way to provide full news integration and automation               
        2   to a video production system, which automatically converts a show rundown into a                
        3   set of computer readable broadcast instructions and automates the execution of a                
        4   live or live-to-tape video show (Specification 6).  An understanding of the                     
        5   invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced               
        6   below:                                                                                          
        7          1.    A method for producing a show live in real time for at least one                   
        8          of transmission and recording in a production environment having at                      
        9          least one processing unit in communications with a plurality of                          
       10          production devices, comprising the steps of:                                             
       11          (a) receiving a show rundown manually assembled by a producer                            
       12          to comprise a plurality of story files; and                                              
       13          (b) converting said show rundown into broadcast instructions that,                       
       14          when executed in a step-by-step manner responsive to a manual                            
       15          trigger from the producer in an event-driven manner, enable the                          
       16          transmitting of commands to control the plurality of production                          
       17          devices to thereby produce the show live in real time for at least one                   
       18          of transmission and recording, wherein said transmitting includes                        
       19          transmitting commands to at least a camera, and a robotic pan/tilt                       
       20          head.                                                                                    
       21                                                                                                   
       22       This appeal arises from the Examiner’s Final Rejection, mailed January 11,                  
       23   2006.  The Appellants filed an Appeal Brief in support of the appeal on February                
       24   17, 2006, and the Examiner mailed an Examiner’s Answer to the Appeal Brief on                   
       25   May 22, 2006.  A Reply Brief was filed on July 14, 2006.                                        
       26                                                                                                   





                                                     2                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013