Appeal 2007-0595
Application 09/822,855
1 Claims 3-6, 8, 12, and 14 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over
2 Trumbull and Kenny.
3 The Appellants contend (Br. 10-11) that these claims are allowable for the
4 same reasons as claim 1, whose rejection we sustained, supra. Accordingly we
5 sustain the Examiner's rejection of claims 3-6, 8, 12, and 14 under 35 U.S.C. §
6 103(a) as obvious over Trumbull and Kenny.
7
8 Claims 7 and 9 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Trumbull,
9 Kenny, and Tao.
10 The Appellants contend (Br. 12) that these claims are allowable for the same
11 reasons as claim 1, whose rejection we sustained, supra. Accordingly we sustain
12 the Examiner's rejection of claims 7 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
13 over Trumbull, Kenny, and Tao.
14
15 Claim 10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Trumbull, Kenny, Tao,
16 and Washino.
17 From the above findings of fact, we must conclude that
18 • The art applied shows populating a broadcast instructions time sheet with
19 production icons (FF18).
20 As to the Appellants’ contention (Br. 14) that Washino does not show the use
21 of icons on a screen showing the icons in time-relation to other commands, as the
22 Examiner pointed out (Answer 10), Tao is applied for showing providing an
23 instructions time sheet, and Washino is relied on to show relating instruction
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013