Appeal 2007-0601
Application 09/792,290
received from each of the individual group members, nor allowing each
group member to view the feedback of other group members.
Accordingly, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejections of claims
6-8, 14, and 17.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
We conclude that Appellants have not shown the Examiner erred in
rejecting claims 1-5, 9-13, 15, 16, 18, and 19. We conclude that Appellants
have shown the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 6-8, 14, and 17.
Claims 1-5, 9-13, 15, 16, 18, and 19 are not patentable.
On the record before us, claims 6-8, 14, and 17 have not been shown
to be unpatentable.
DECISION
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5, 9-13, 15, 16, 18, and 19 is
affirmed. The Examiner’s rejection of claims 6-8, 14, and 17 is reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
eld
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013