Appeal 2007-0610
Application 09/766,357
E. Conclusion of Law
On the record before us, Appellant has failed to show that the
Examiner erred in rejecting claims 4, 13, and 22 over the prior art.
DECISION
The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1, 8-10, 17-19, 26, and
27 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) over Kent and Cornuejols; claim 2, 11, and 20
under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) over Kent, Cornuejols, and Mohr; claims 3, 12, and
21 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) over Kent, Cornuejols, and McCormick; claims
4, 13, and 22 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) over Kent, Cornuejols, Dowling, and
Weiss, is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
jlb
IBM Corporation
Intellectual Property Law
Dept. IQOA/Bldg. 040-3
1701 North Street
Endicott, NY 13760
22
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Last modified: September 9, 2013