Appeal 2007-0635 Application 10/176,598 10. The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of associating a timestamp with each of the popularity metrics, the timestamp for indicating a last playback time of a corresponding media file. A. ISSUE The issue is whether it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to modify the Ward method so as to include a step of associating a timestamp with each of the popularity metrics, the timestamp for indicating a last playback time of a corresponding media file. B. FACTS The record supports the following findings of fact (FF) by a preponderance of the evidence. Claim construction We incorporate herein the facts under Claim construction of the Facts section for 2, 4-9, and 12-16 above and add the following: 1. The claim does not define the term “timestamp.” 2. The specification indicates that the “timestamp” may be based on the quantity of time the media is played back. Step 505 may include the step of associating a timestamp with the popularity metric (step 505a). … The computing/updating of the popularity metric at step 505 may be based upon the actual time and/or multiple of some quantity of time (e.g., seconds, minutes, etc.) that the media file is played back. Specification 10: 11-22. 12Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013