1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
2 publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5
6 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
7 _____________
8
9 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
10 AND INTERFERENCES
11 _____________
12
13 Ex parte KEITH A. CARPENTER and AMY C. BEISENHERZ
14 _____________
15
16 Appeal No. 2007-0645
17 Application No. 10/242,898
18 Technology Center 2100
19 ______________
20
21 Decided: April 9, 2007
22 _______________
23
24 Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, STUART S. LEVY, and ROBERT E. NAPPI
25 Administrative Patent Judges.
26
27 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
28
29
30 DECISION ON APPEAL
31
32 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of
33 claims 1 through 24. For the reasons stated infra we affirm the Examiner’s
34 rejection of these claims.
35
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013