Ex Parte Kuruoglu et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                    
                                           precedent of the Board.                                             

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                          Ex parte ERCAN E. KURUOGLU, ALEX S. TAYLOR,                                          
                            MAURITIUS SEEGER, and STUART A. TAYLOR                                             
                                               ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-0666                                                 
                                           Application 09/738,992                                              
                                          Technology Center 2100                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                         Decided: September 6, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                    

                Before JOHN C. MARTIN, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and JAY P.                                         
                LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
                BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   

                                      I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                 
                      A Patent Examiner rejected claims 1-22.  The Appellants appeal                           
                therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                      
                § 6(b).                                                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013