The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERCAN E. KURUOGLU, ALEX S. TAYLOR,
MAURITIUS SEEGER, and STUART A. TAYLOR
____________
Appeal 2007-0666
Application 09/738,992
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 6, 2007
____________
Before JOHN C. MARTIN, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and JAY P.
LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A Patent Examiner rejected claims 1-22. The Appellants appeal
therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013