Appeal 2007-0666 Application 09/738,992 Absent a teaching or suggestion of transmitting, to each of a plurality of workstations, data representing handwritten annotations that were made to a paper document via at least two of the workstations, and displaying at least one of the handwritten annotations at each of the workstations, we are unpersuaded of a prima facie case of obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the rejection of claims 1, 11, and 12, and of claims 2-6, 8-10, 13-17, and 19-22, which depend therefrom. The Examiner does not allege, let alone show, that the addition of Levine cures the aforementioned deficiency of Carleton, Tran, Simonoff, and Cass. Therefore, we also reverse the rejection of these claims. V. ORDER In summary, the rejections of claims 1-22 under § 103(a) are reversed. REVERSED pgc John E. Beck Xerox Corporation Xerox Square-20A Rochester NY 14644 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013