Appeal 2007-0690
Application 10/224,917
Claims 1 through 3, 5, 8 through 10, 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 22, and 24
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as being anticipated by Jones ‘638.
In a second stated rejection, claims 1, 4, 15, 18, 19, and 24 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Leanheart. In a third stated
rejection, the Examiner rejects claims 2, 5, 9, 10, 12, 16, and 17 under 35
U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner relies upon
Leanheart in view of Jones ‘046. Next, in a fourth stated rejection, the
Examiner separately rejects claim 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of
obviousness here, the Examiner relies upon Leanheart in view of Jones ‘046,
further in view of Jones ‘638. In a fifth stated rejection, under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103, the Examiner relies upon Leanheart in view of Kim as to claim 8. In
a sixth stated rejection, also under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the Examiner rejects
claim 11 over Leanheart in view of Jones ‘046, further in view of Li. Next,
in a seventh stated rejection, also under Section 103, the Examiner relies
upon Leanheart in view of Jones ‘638 to reject claims 13 and 14. Next, the
Examiner relies upon Leanheart in view of Toyama as to claim 20 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 in an eighth stated rejection. To reject claim 21 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 in a ninth stated rejection, the Examiner relies upon Leanheart
in view of Yen. In a tenth stated rejection, the Examiner rejects claim 22
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based upon Leanheart in view of Jones ‘638. In an
eleventh stated rejection, the Examiner relies upon Jones ‘638 in view of
Kobayashi to reject claim 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. This claim is
additionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in a twelfth stated rejection
based upon Leanheart in view of Kobayashi.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013