Appeal 2007-0690 Application 10/224,917 Since we are in full agreement with Appellants’ observations at pages 8 and 9 of the Brief as to Jones ‘638, we reproduce them here: [A] PMMD [portable mass memory device] of the present teachings is readily distinguishable from other forms of mass memory device in that only specific, intentionally selected data editing abilities are enabled (i.e., configured) therein. As recited by claim 1, editing such data can only be performed as : 1) selectively deleting data as discrete files from the mass memory of the PMMD; and 2) selectively arranging data (as discrete files), relative to each other, so that a desired storage order or sequence is achieved within the mass memory of the PMMD. Conversely, a user cannot for example, inadvertently and/or irreversibly alter the content or characteristics of a particular electronic file (e.g., a digital photograph, etc.) stored within the mass memory of a PMMD. (See at least page 4, lines 25-31; and page 11, lines 5-15 of the Specification as originally filed). A2. Jones ‘638 (6,438,638) teaches a stand-alone FlashToaster (80) that allows the copying of data from one or more types of flash- memory card (16, 18, 24, 28) onto a removable storage media (76) such as a CD-R/W, a floppy diskette, etc. Such copying is performed from the flash-memory card to the removable media in response to a single button push (79) (Col. 9, line 41 to col. 10, line 39; and Fig. 9 of Jones ‘638). In fact Jones ‘638 teaches that the single push button (79) and a single LED (light emitting diode) (78) constitute the only user interface provided by the Flash Toaster (80) (Col. 10, lines 27-34 of Jones ‘638). Jones ‘638 offers no teachings or suggestions as to any other sort of operation that can be performed by the FlashToaster (80) in response to a user input via the single push button (79). Therefore, the copying function just described above is the only such function that can be performed using the FlashToaster (80) of Jones ‘638 as a stand-alone entity. In any case, Jones ‘638 fails to provide, teach or suggest a portable mass memory device, wherein the device is not enabled to allow data stored in the mass memory to be edited other than selective arrangement and deletions of data from the mass memory, as recited 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013