Ex Parte BROWNING et al - Page 23



                Appeal 2007-0700                                                                              
                Application 09/159,509                                                                        
                Patent 5,559,995                                                                              

                                                     (6)                                                      
                                    What subject matter is surrendered?                                       
                      In a case involving Substep (3)(a) of Step 3 of Clement, what is the                    
                subject matter surrendered?                                                                   
                      Is it                                                                                   
                             (1)   the subject matter of an application claim which was                       
                                   amended or canceled or                                                     
                             (2) the subject matter of an application claim which was                         
                                   amended or canceled and, on a limitation-by-limitation                     
                                   basis, the territory falling between the scope of                          
                                   (a)    the application claim which was canceled or                         
                                          amended and                                                         
                                   (b) the patent claim which was ultimately issued?                          
                We believe North American Container stands for the proposition that it is                     
                (2) and not (1).  Accordingly, we hold that it is (2).                                        

                                                     (7)                                                      
                                   Clement principles are not per se rules                                    
                      Our reading of our appellate reviewing court’s recapture opinions, as                   
                a whole, suggests that the Clement steps should not be viewed as per se                       
                rules.  For example, we note the following in Clement, 131 F.3d at 1469, 45                   
                USPQ2d at 1164:                                                                               
                      Although the recapture rule does not apply in the absence of                            
                      evidence that the Appellant’s amendment was “an admission                               

                                                    - 23 -                                                    

Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013