Ex Parte Prindiville - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                      Ex parte CASEY PRINDIVILLE                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0707                                                 
                                           Application 10/799,468                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                        Decided: February 16, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                                    
                CHARLES F. WAREN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21-36.  Claim 21 is                
                illustrative:                                                                                 
                      21.    In semiconductor manufacture, an apparatus for attaching an                      
                adhesive-film strip, supplied from a length of adhesive film that comprises                   
                an adhesive portion and a coverlay portion adhering to the adhesive portion,                  
                to a support element, the apparatus comprising:                                               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013